Information Centre · Contested Wills & TFM Claims

Probate Caveats in Victoria: Purpose, Grounds and Procedure

A probate caveat, while effective, prevents a grant of representation from issuing so that a question about the Will's validity or the applicant's entitlement can be dealt with by the Court. This guide explains standing, grounds, the current RedCrest-Probate filing procedure, expiry and the caveat summons process under Order 8 of the Supreme Court (Administration and Probate) Rules 2023.

Supreme Court of Victoria signage, reflecting the probate caveat procedure under Order 8 of the Supreme Court (Administration and Probate) Rules 2023.
By Parke Lawyers Editorial TeamReviewed by JIM PARKE, Lawyer & Chartered AccountantLast reviewed

A probate caveat is a procedural filing at the Probate Office of the Supreme Court of Victoria that prevents a grant of probate or letters of administration from issuing while the caveat remains effective. It is regulated by Order 8 of the Supreme Court (Administration and Probate) Rules 2023 and by the Court's current probate practice.

This article summarises when a caveat may be appropriate, how it is filed, how it expires or is brought to a head by a caveat summons, and how it interacts with family provision proceedings under Part IV of the Administration and Probate Act 1958 (Vic).

What a Probate Caveat Does

While a caveat is on foot, the Probate Office will not make a grant of representation in the estate. The caveat does not itself resolve a dispute about the Will, capacity, entitlement or provision — it prevents a grant from issuing while it is effective. If grounds of objection are filed within the period allowed by the Rules, the matter then proceeds under Order 8 of the Supreme Court (Administration and Probate) Rules 2023.

A caveat is not the mechanism for challenging a grant that has already been made, and it does not stop, extend or replace a family provision claim under Part IV of the Administration and Probate Act 1958 (Vic).

When a Caveat May Be Appropriate

A caveat should be considered only where the caveator has standing in the estate and identifiable grounds that go to whether a grant should be made or to whom. Examples include:

  • a claim that a later testamentary document revokes the Will being propounded;
  • a genuine, evidence-based concern about testamentary capacity, knowledge and approval, or undue influence;
  • a dispute about due execution or the identity of the Will;
  • a dispute about which person is entitled to apply for a grant (for example where an earlier-named executor survives).

Dissatisfaction with the size of a gift under a valid Will, or a wish to press an executor to negotiate, is not a caveat ground. Those concerns are addressed, if at all, through a Part IV family provision claim or through an application concerning the executor's conduct after a grant. See our companion guides on challenging testamentary capacity and undue influence and suspicious circumstances.

Filing a Caveat

A caveat is filed at the Probate Office through the Court's RedCrest-Probate electronic filing system, on payment of the fee prescribed by the current probate fee schedule. It must be filed in the form and manner required by the Rules and the Court's current guidance. The document must identify the deceased, the caveator, the caveator's standing in the estate and the grounds of the caveat.

The caveat becomes effective on filing. Under the Rules it expires six months after filing unless it is renewed as permitted. It may also be withdrawn by the caveator or otherwise dealt with by order of the Court.

What Happens When a Grant Is Sought

When a person applies for a grant while a caveat is in place, the Registrar will give the caveator the notice prescribed by the Rules. Under rule 8.02, the caveat then expires 30 days after that notice is given unless, within that period, the caveator files grounds of objection or the Court otherwise orders.

Grounds of objection are filed through RedCrest-Probate. They must state the caveator's standing and set out the grounds on which the caveat is maintained, with the particularity required by the Rules and the Court's current probate-office guidance.

The Caveat Summons

Once grounds of objection have been filed, the matter is progressed by a caveat summons issued out of the Probate Office and returnable before the Court. Under the Rules:

  • the caveator must file the caveat summons within seven days of filing grounds of objection;
  • if the caveator does not do so, the grant applicant may file the summons;
  • the summons is served in accordance with the Rules; and
  • consistent with current Supreme Court probate practice, the return date is fixed as a directions day in the List at least 28 days after the summons is filed.

The first hearing is ordinarily for directions. What happens after that depends on the grounds relied on, the evidence, and the orders the Court decides to make for the future conduct of the matter.

Standing and Grounds

The Rules require the caveator to identify their standing — for example as a beneficiary under an earlier Will, a person entitled to apply for a grant, or a person with an arguable basis to challenge validity — and to state the grounds relied on. Generalised objections risk being set aside by the Court, with costs consequences.

Costs

Costs orders in probate proceedings are discretionary. They depend on the strength of the grounds, the caveator's conduct and the outcome. A caveat filed or maintained without proper standing or arguable grounds may attract an adverse costs order against the caveator personally. See our companion guide on costs in contested will proceedings in Victoria.

Caveats and Family Provision Claims

A caveat and a Part IV family provision claim address different issues. A caveat concerns whether a grant should issue and to whom. A Part IV claim seeks further provision from the estate and is distinct from whether or in what form a grant should issue. The two proceedings may run at the same time, but one does not extend the time for the other. Time limits for Part IV claims are addressed in our guide to time limits for TFM claims and our family provision claims overview.

After a Grant Has Been Made

The caveat mechanism is directed to preventing a grant from issuing. Once a grant has been made, a party who wishes to challenge the grant must consider other proceedings — for example, an application for revocation of the grant — which have their own requirements and are not addressed in this article.

When to Take Advice

The decision to file a caveat, and the decisions made when a caveat is in place, involve procedural rules, standing questions, evidentiary requirements and costs risk. Legal advice should be taken before filing. Our estate litigation team and probate and estate administration team can advise on standing, grounds, the current RedCrest-Probate procedure and the appropriate next step. See also our overview of estate litigation lawyers in Melbourne.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a probate caveat?

A probate caveat is a document filed at the Probate Office of the Supreme Court of Victoria that, while it remains effective, prevents a grant of representation from issuing in the estate. It is governed by Order 8 of the Supreme Court (Administration and Probate) Rules 2023. It does not decide the underlying question; it simply requires that the issues be dealt with by the Court before any grant is made.

Who can file a probate caveat?

A caveat may be filed by a person who claims to be interested in the estate — for example, a beneficiary under an earlier Will, a person who says they would be entitled to apply for a grant, or a person who has an arguable basis to challenge the validity of the Will or the applicant's entitlement. The caveator must state their standing and the grounds relied on. A person seeking greater provision from a valid Will does not, by that reason alone, have grounds for a probate caveat — that is addressed by a Part IV family provision claim.

When can a caveat be filed?

A caveat may be filed after the death of the person concerned and before a grant is made. It is filed through the Court's RedCrest-Probate electronic filing system on payment of the current Probate Office fee. Executors and caveators should check the Court's current fee schedule before filing.

How long is a caveat effective?

Under the Supreme Court (Administration and Probate) Rules 2023, a caveat expires six months after the date it is filed unless it is renewed as permitted by the Rules. It may also be withdrawn by the caveator, or removed or otherwise dealt with by order of the Court.

What happens when someone applies for a grant while a caveat is in place?

Under Order 8, once an application for a grant is made and the caveator has been notified in accordance with the Rules, the caveat will expire 30 days after the Registrar gives the prescribed notice unless grounds of objection are filed within that period or the Court otherwise orders. Grounds of objection are filed through RedCrest-Probate and must state the caveator's standing and set out the grounds on which the caveat is maintained.

What is a caveat summons and who files it?

Once grounds of objection have been filed, the matter is progressed by a caveat summons issued out of the Probate Office and returnable before the Court. Under the Rules the caveator must file the summons within seven days of filing grounds of objection; if the caveator does not, the grant applicant may file the summons. The summons is served in accordance with the Rules and, consistent with current Supreme Court probate practice, specifies a return date fixed as a directions day in the List at least 28 days after the summons is filed. The first hearing is ordinarily for directions.

What grounds justify a probate caveat?

Grounds must go to whether a grant should issue at all or to whom it should be made. Examples that may support a caveat include a claim that a later Will revokes the Will propounded, a genuine question about testamentary capacity, knowledge and approval, or undue influence, improper execution, or a dispute about who is entitled to apply for a grant. Executor conduct after a grant, or dissatisfaction with the size of a gift under a valid Will, is not itself a caveat ground.

Can a caveat be filed after a grant has been made?

No. A caveat under Order 8 is directed to preventing a grant from issuing. If a grant has already been made, the caveat mechanism is not available; a party wishing to challenge the grant must consider proceedings for revocation of the grant or other appropriate proceedings.

Does a caveat affect a family provision claim?

A caveat and a family provision claim under Part IV of the Administration and Probate Act 1958 (Vic) address different issues. A caveat concerns whether a grant should issue and to whom; a Part IV claim seeks further provision from the estate and is distinct from whether or in what form a grant should issue. The two are separate proceedings, may run at the same time, and one does not extend the time for the other.

What are the costs risks of filing a caveat?

Costs orders in probate matters are discretionary. A caveator who files or maintains a caveat without proper standing or arguable grounds may be ordered to pay the costs of the grant applicant, and in some cases the costs of the estate. Costs outcomes depend on conduct, the strength of the grounds and the orders the Court decides to make.

Found this article helpful? Share it

LinkedInEmailFacebookX

For a clean PDF, choose Save as PDF, select A4, turn off Headers and footers, and turn on Background graphics.

Contested Wills & TFM Claims

Considering a caveat, or responding to one?

We advise on standing, grounds and the current Order 8 procedure, and act for caveators and grant applicants through to resolution.

← Back to the Information Centre

This article is general information only and does not constitute legal advice. Please obtain advice tailored to your circumstances.