Information Centre · Probate & Deceased Estates

Can an Executor Distribute an Estate Before Tax Is Finalised?

A practical Australian guide for executors, beneficiaries, accountants and advisers on whether an executor can safely distribute a deceased estate before tax is finalised — what to retain, when to make interim distributions, how to manage beneficiary pressure, and how to avoid personal liability for over-distribution. General information only — not taxation advice.

Electronic funds transfer concept illustrating executor distributions, estate payments and beneficiary distributions during estate administration.
By Parke Lawyers Editorial TeamReviewed by JIM PARKE, Lawyer & Chartered AccountantLast reviewed

Key points

  • Probate confers authority to administer the estate — it does not mean the estate is ready to distribute.
  • Executors should not distribute the residue until tax liabilities (final personal return, estate returns, CGT, super) have been quantified or properly retained for.
  • Interim distributions are common and sensible once probate is granted, debts are paid and the residue clearly exceeds the retention required.
  • Beneficiary indemnities strengthen the executor's position but are not a substitute for adequate retention.
  • The executor is personally liable to the ATO for assessed tax to the extent of estate assets received — over-distribution exposes the executor, not the beneficiaries who spent the money.
  • Estate litigation, post-death DRP allocations, unsold investment property and overseas beneficiaries are common reasons to delay or limit a distribution.

Almost every executor we act for asks the same question once probate has been granted: "Can I start paying the beneficiaries yet?" The pressure to distribute is real. Beneficiaries are often grieving, short of cash, or simply impatient. They see the grant of probate as a green light and they expect the money to flow shortly afterwards. Yet the executor's most dangerous decisions in the administration of an estate are usually made in precisely this window — between obtaining probate and finalising the estate's tax position. Distribute too early without retaining enough for tax, and the executor can end up personally liable for shortfalls that the beneficiaries have already spent.

This article explains, in plain language, when an executor can distribute a deceased estate before the tax is finalised, when an interim distribution is appropriate, what amounts should be retained, how beneficiary indemnities work in practice and how to manage beneficiary pressure without exposing yourself to personal liability. It is written for executors, beneficiaries, accountants and advisers, and it is general information only — not taxation advice.

Why Executors Want to Distribute Early

Most executors are family members or close friends of the deceased. They administer one or two estates in their lifetime, often during a period of grief, and they are usually keen to bring the administration to a close quickly. The pressure to distribute early comes from several directions: beneficiaries who are financially stretched and want their inheritance; beneficiaries who distrust the executor and assume delay equals misconduct; the executor's own desire to be finished with the administration; and a general misunderstanding that "probate granted" means "ready to distribute".

Early distribution is not inherently wrong. Interim distributions are common, sensible and often expected in estates that take more than a year to administer. What is wrong is distributing before the executor understands the tax position — or distributing without retaining enough to meet that position with comfort.

Probate Is Authority, Not Readiness

A grant of probate confirms that the will is valid and that the executor named in the will has authority to administer the estate. It does not confirm that the estate's debts and liabilities have been ascertained, that the tax position is settled, or that the residue is ready to be paid out. Many executors arrive at the same misconception: "Probate is granted; I can now distribute." That is incorrect. Probate is the executor's licence to act. It is the start of the real work, not the end.

See our companion article on probate in Victoria for the underlying process, and our article on letters of administration in Victoria where there is no executor or no valid will.

Authority to Administer vs Readiness to Distribute

It helps to draw a clean distinction between two concepts that beneficiaries (and many executors) treat as the same:

  • Authority to administer is a legal concept. The executor has the legal power to deal with the estate's assets and liabilities. This is conferred by the will and confirmed by probate. It answers the question "is the executor allowed to act?".
  • Readiness to distribute is a practical, financial and tax concept. The executor has identified the estate's liabilities (including tax), provided for them, ascertained the residue and is confident that the proposed distribution will not leave the estate short. It answers the question "is it safe to distribute?".

Probate confers authority on day one. Readiness to distribute the residue often takes another twelve to twenty-four months — sometimes longer for complex, litigated or international estates.

Executor Duties Before Distribution

Before making any meaningful distribution, the executor's core duties include:

  • collecting in the estate's assets;
  • identifying and paying funeral and administration expenses;
  • identifying and paying creditors;
  • lodging the deceased's final personal income tax return and any outstanding prior-year returns;
  • applying for the estate's separate TFN and lodging estate trust returns each year of administration;
  • quantifying CGT on any sale of estate assets;
  • quantifying superannuation death benefit tax payable by non-dependant beneficiaries;
  • reserving for foreshadowed litigation (TFM claims, caveats, will challenges);
  • obtaining accounting and legal advice on the proposed distribution; and
  • documenting the distribution decision and obtaining beneficiary indemnities where appropriate.

For a fuller treatment of the underlying duties, see our article on the duties of an executor in Victoria and on fiduciary duties of an executor in Victoria.

Estate Liabilities and Tax Liabilities

The estate is liable for everything the deceased owed at death (subject to the rules on which creditors take priority), everything the estate incurs during administration, and the tax assessed on the deceased's final return and the estate's trust returns. From the executor's personal-risk perspective, tax liabilities sit in a category of their own because the ATO has specific statutory powers to pursue the legal personal representative to the extent of estate assets that have passed through the executor's hands.

Common tax liabilities that arise after the executor has begun distributing include: amended assessments on the deceased's final return; late assessments on prior-year personal returns; CGT assessed on sales the executor has reported but the ATO recalculates; tax on superannuation death benefits paid to non-dependants; and unexpected income from a late distribution from a managed fund or share registry that arrives after the executor thought the income stream had ended.

The Deceased's Final Personal Tax Return

The deceased's final return covers the period from 1 July of the year of death to the date of death. It is lodged under the deceased's TFN, marked "final", and is the executor's responsibility. Salary, interest, dividends, business income and capital gains are all apportioned to the part-year. PAYG withholding for the part-year often produces a refund, but not always — an investor who realised significant gains earlier in the year can leave a final-return liability for the executor to fund. The final return must be reconciled and assessed before the executor can confidently calculate the residue.

Estate Income Tax Returns

From the day after death, the estate is treated as a trust for income tax purposes. The estate lodges a trust return (form TRT) under the estate's own TFN for each year of administration. The return reports interest, dividends, rent, managed-fund distributions, business income and capital gains accrued by estate assets, less deductions properly attributable to estate income. It also allocates net income between presently entitled beneficiaries and the trustee. Estate returns continue to be lodged until the estate is "fully administered" for tax purposes. See our articles on who pays tax on estate income in Australia, when an estate income tax return is required and when a deceased estate ends for tax purposes.

Present Entitlement and Why It Matters for Distribution Timing

"Present entitlement" is the central concept that decides whether estate income is taxed in the estate's (trustee's) hands or in a beneficiary's hands under Division 6 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth). In broad terms, a beneficiary is presently entitled to estate income for a year of income where they have an immediate, indefeasible right to demand payment of that income from the executor. Where a beneficiary is presently entitled and not under a legal disability, the beneficiary is assessed on their share of net trust income under section 97. Where no beneficiary is presently entitled, the trustee is assessed under sections 99 or 99A.

During the early phase of administration the ATO generally accepts that no beneficiary is presently entitled to estate income because the executor is still ascertaining assets, paying debts and working out the residue. As the estate becomes "partly" and then "fully" administered, beneficiaries can become presently entitled to income — and the tax treatment shifts from the trustee's hands to the beneficiaries' hands. Interim and final distributions are not the only way present entitlement arises, but the timing of distributions, distribution resolutions and the executor's communications with beneficiaries are often what crystallises it in a particular year. That is why distribution timing is also a tax question, not just a residue question. See our companion articles on who pays tax on estate income in Australia and when a deceased estate ends for tax purposes.

Capital Gains Tax Issues

CGT is the single most common tax surprise in deceased estate administration. Division 128 rolls the deceased's cost base over to the executor (and on transfer, to the beneficiary). However, sales by the executor during administration are CGT events in the estate's hands. Post-death dividend reinvestment plan (DRP) shares are estate acquisitions, not inherited assets, and have their own cost base. The two-year main-residence window runs from the date of death and does not pause. See our cornerstone articles on capital gains tax in deceased estates and dividend reinvestment plans and deceased estates. The executor must have a clear CGT picture before calculating any retention.

Superannuation Death Benefit Tax (High Level)

Where superannuation is paid to the estate and on-paid to a non-dependant (typically an adult independent child), the taxable component is taxed in the trustee's hands at 15% plus Medicare (or 30% plus Medicare for any untaxed element). The tax is paid from the estate but is properly borne by the non-dependant beneficiary; failing to recover it from their share before distribution effectively makes the other beneficiaries subsidise their tax bill. This is a routine source of disputes after distribution and should be addressed in writing before any super-derived funds leave the estate's account.

Deceased Estate TFNs

The estate's TFN should be applied for immediately the estate begins to derive income. It is used for the estate's trust returns and for TFN withholding certifications to banks, share registries and managed funds. Without it, financial institutions withhold tax at the top marginal rate on interest and unfranked dividend income, creating cash-flow problems and refund delays at the end of administration.

ATO Correspondence and Assessments

ATO assessments do not issue automatically the day a return is lodged. The Commissioner usually takes weeks to months to issue a notice of assessment, and may issue an amendment within the standard amendment period (two or four years depending on the taxpayer's circumstances, longer for fraud or evasion). A careful executor will wait for assessments before making final distributions and will retain enough to comfortably absorb amendment risk. See our article on the ATO's approach to deceased estates and probate.

Retaining Funds for Tax and Expenses

How much should the executor retain? Enough to cover, with comfort:

  • the best estimate of the remaining tax liabilities (final personal return, estate returns, CGT, super tax);
  • a margin for ATO amendment risk on lodged returns;
  • remaining administration expenses (legal, accounting, valuation, registry, conveyancing);
  • any foreshadowed litigation, including the cost of defending it; and
  • a contingency for late-emerging creditors and unexpected liabilities.

There is no rule of thumb. A simple, solvent estate with no business interests and no CGT exposure may justify a small retention; an estate with significant shareholdings, post-death DRP allocations, an unsold investment property and a foreshadowed TFM claim should retain materially everything until those issues are resolved. When in doubt, retain more, not less — beneficiaries can always be paid the retention when assessments issue.

Interim Distributions

An interim distribution is a partial payment to a residuary beneficiary on account of their final entitlement. It can be a sensible response to beneficiary pressure where the estate is clearly solvent and the remaining retention is sufficient. Interim distributions should be:

  • recorded in writing, with a clear statement that the payment is on account of the beneficiary's eventual entitlement;
  • accompanied by an indemnity by the beneficiary to repay any over-distribution;
  • accompanied by a retention statement explaining what is held back and why; and
  • signed off by the executor's accountant and (for material distributions) by the executor's lawyer.

Equal residuary beneficiaries should usually receive equal interim distributions on the same date. Unequal interim distributions to selected beneficiaries are possible but create their own risks (preferment, breach of trust, beneficiary disputes) and should be documented carefully.

Final Distributions

The final distribution is the payment that closes a beneficiary's entitlement (or, in the case of the last one, that closes the estate). It should follow:

  • lodgement and assessment of every required tax return;
  • receipt of every refund or payment of every liability;
  • finalisation of administration expenses;
  • recalculation of the residue;
  • accounting sign-off on the final distribution figures;
  • a written distribution statement; and
  • a beneficiary release (or, if a beneficiary refuses, a court application to pass accounts).

Final distributions are by definition not reversible without litigation. The standard for "ready" is much higher than for an interim distribution.

Testamentary Trusts and Distribution Timing

Where the will establishes a testamentary trust (for example, for minor children, a vulnerable beneficiary, asset protection or tax-planning purposes), the executor's distribution timetable can look quite different from a will that gifts the residue outright. Once the estate is administered, assets or income may move into the continuing testamentary trust rather than being paid out to a beneficiary, and the trustee of the testamentary trust then assumes responsibility for managing those assets and any future distributions under the terms of the trust. Distribution decisions in that setting are made by reference to the testamentary trust deed (as set out in the will), not just by reference to the residuary clauses. See our articles on taxation of testamentary trusts explained and testamentary trusts explained for further background on how testamentary trusts operate and the tax issues they raise.

Beneficiary Indemnities

A beneficiary indemnity is a written undertaking by the beneficiary to repay any over-distribution if the estate's liabilities turn out to exceed the retention. Well-drafted indemnities identify the payment, confirm the beneficiary's understanding that it is on account of their entitlement, oblige the beneficiary to repay on demand, and are signed before the funds are transferred. Indemnities are not a substitute for adequate retention — a beneficiary who has spent the money or moved overseas may not be in a position to repay — but they do strengthen the executor's hand and limit the executor's exposure.

Refunding Bonds and Indemnity-Style Arrangements

In some overseas jurisdictions, and historically in some Australian contexts, executors take a formal "refunding bond" from a beneficiary before paying a distribution — essentially a written promise (often with a surety) to refund any over-distribution if estate liabilities later exceed the amount retained. In Australia today, executors more commonly use beneficiary acknowledgements, written indemnities or retention arrangements rather than formal refunding bonds, with the specific form depending on the size and complexity of the estate and on the executor's legal and accounting advice. The practical strength of any of these arrangements depends on the beneficiary's ability to repay if called upon, the clarity of the document, and the executor's ability to enforce it — none of which should be overstated. They are a useful complement to an adequate retention; they are not a substitute for one.

Executor Personal Liability

The executor (as legal personal representative) is personally liable to the ATO for tax assessed on the deceased's final return and on the estate's trust returns, to the extent of the estate assets the executor has received (or could have received) in that capacity. If the executor distributes the residue without retaining enough for tax and the ATO later issues a debit assessment, the ATO can pursue the executor personally. The same risk applies to unpaid estate creditors who can show that proper advertising for claims was not undertaken. Executor personal liability is the central reason careful executors retain generously and wait for ATO clearance before final distribution.

At a general level, section 254 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) recognises that executors, administrators and other "agents and trustees" — including the legal personal representative of a deceased estate — can have tax responsibilities in respect of income, profits or gains derived by them in their representative capacity, and in respect of the assets coming into their control. The detailed operation of section 254 and related provisions (including how the ATO applies them in practice) is a matter for specialist tax advice. The high-level point for executors is that the legislation reinforces, rather than reduces, the need to retain a sufficient amount from estate assets before distributing — and not to assume that beneficiaries will absorb a later tax liability after distribution has occurred. This article is general information only and is not taxation advice.

Over-Distribution Risks

Over-distribution risks include: personal liability of the executor to the ATO and to unpaid creditors; the practical impossibility of clawing back funds from beneficiaries who have spent them; inequity between beneficiaries; litigation between the executor and beneficiaries (with its costs consequences); and reputational exposure for executors who are professionals. The professional indemnity policy of a solicitor-executor may not respond to liabilities incurred while acting as executor (rather than as solicitor) — which is one reason solicitors who act as executor should review their policy wording and seriously consider retaining a third-party executor instead.

Estate Litigation and Disputed Distributions

Where TFM family-provision litigation, a probate caveat, a will-validity challenge or a creditor's claim is foreshadowed or filed, the executor should distribute nothing without legal advice. In Victoria, section 99A of the Administration and Probate Act 1958 (Vic) prevents distribution within six months of the grant of probate without the court's leave once a TFM claim has been notified. Outside that statutory window, distributing while litigation is on foot exposes the executor to personal liability if the claim succeeds and the estate has insufficient funds to meet the order. See our article on time limits for TFM claims in Victoria and our service page on estate litigation and TFM claims.

Managing Pressure from Beneficiaries

Beneficiary pressure is normal. Beneficiaries do not see the tax calendar, the ATO correspondence and the retention calculations the executor sees. The executor's best response is communication: a written update at the start of administration, written updates each quarter, and a written explanation of any decision to defer or limit distributions. A structured interim distribution accompanied by an indemnity and a retention statement is almost always a better answer to pressure than refusing to distribute anything at all. Beneficiaries who feel heard rarely sue; beneficiaries who feel ignored often do. See our article on beneficiary rights during estate administration and on can an executor be paid in Victoria.

Practical Risk-Management Checklist

  1. Obtain accounting advice at the start of administration.
  2. Apply for the estate's TFN immediately and provide TFN withholding details to all institutions.
  3. Lodge the deceased's final return promptly.
  4. Lodge estate returns each year and obtain assessments before relying on retention figures.
  5. Document every distribution decision in writing, including the retention calculation.
  6. Obtain beneficiary indemnities for every interim distribution.
  7. Defer the executor's commission until final distribution.
  8. Obtain accounting and legal sign-off on the final distribution plan.
  9. Keep all records for the longer of seven years and the period of beneficiaries' minority plus a buffer.
  10. Communicate with beneficiaries in writing each quarter and at every decision point.

When to Obtain Legal and Accounting Advice

Legal advice should be obtained at the start of administration, again before any material interim distribution and again before the final distribution. Accounting advice should be obtained at the start of administration (to set up TFNs and reporting), at each tax return cycle, and at the point the executor is considering closing the estate. Estates with business interests, significant CGT assets, post-death DRP allocations, overseas beneficiaries, contested wills or super death benefits should treat both disciplines as compulsory. The cost of the advice is dwarfed by the cost of an over-distribution that triggers ATO recovery against the executor personally.

For related guidance, see our service pages on probate and estate administration, wills and estate planning, commercial and business law and estate litigation and TFM claims.

Worked Examples: Why a Retention Can Be Prudent

The following short examples illustrate why a careful executor often holds a retention before paying a final distribution. The numbers are illustrative only and are not taxation advice.

Example 1 — dividend income and an uncertain tax assessment. An estate holds an ASX share portfolio that produces approximately $42,000 of franked dividends in the first full year of administration. The executor has paid administration expenses, the deceased's final return has been lodged, and the estate's trust return has been lodged but not yet assessed. Two residuary beneficiaries are pressing for distribution of the entire residue. Because the trust return is not yet assessed, and because the franking credit refund and the precise allocation of net income between the trustee and any presently entitled beneficiary are not yet settled, the executor's accountant recommends retaining an amount sufficient to cover the estimated tax payable plus a margin for amendment risk and remaining administration costs. An interim distribution of the balance is made on indemnity, with a clear retention statement explaining what is held back and why. When the assessment issues and any refund is received, the retention is released.

Example 2 — capital gain on a sale before final distribution. The executor sells an investment property and a parcel of listed shares during administration to fund equal money distributions to four residuary beneficiaries. Both sales are CGT events in the estate's hands and produce a net capital gain that flows into the estate's trust return. The cost-base reconstruction for the shares is incomplete and one parcel was acquired post-death under a dividend reinvestment plan. Until the CGT calculation is finalised, signed off by the accountant and reflected in an assessed estate return, the executor cannot quantify the estate's residue with confidence. A retention is held back from the interim distribution to cover the anticipated CGT plus an amendment margin; the balance is released to beneficiaries on indemnity; and the final distribution is deferred until the ATO assessment issues.

In each example, the retention is a tool to protect both the executor and the beneficiaries — not a delay tactic. Without it, an unexpected increase in the assessed tax can leave the executor personally exposed and the over-distributed beneficiaries facing demands for repayment of funds they may already have spent.

General Information Only

This article is general information only and is not taxation advice. The right time to distribute a particular estate depends on its specific facts — the terms of the will, the composition of the estate, the beneficiaries' circumstances, the presence of litigation and the executor's appetite for personal risk. Executors and beneficiaries should obtain advice from a tax-qualified accountant and a specialist estates lawyer before any material interim distribution and before the final distribution.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can an executor distribute an estate before the tax is finalised?

Yes — but only carefully. There is no rule in Australian law that an executor must wait for every ATO assessment, clearance and refund before paying anything to beneficiaries. Many executors make interim distributions long before the final tax position is settled, particularly where the estate is solvent and the residue is clearly ample to meet outstanding tax. The question is not whether the executor CAN distribute early, but whether doing so is SAFE — and whether the executor is comfortable with personal exposure if the eventual tax bill is larger than expected. Distributing too early without retaining enough for tax and contingencies is one of the most common ways executors end up personally liable.

Doesn't probate mean the estate is ready for distribution?

No. Probate is a court order confirming the validity of the will and the executor's authority to administer the estate. It is the executor's licence to act — to collect in assets, pay debts, deal with the ATO and ultimately distribute. It is not a tick-box that the estate is ready to be paid out. Many executors confuse the grant of probate with readiness to distribute and pay out the residue within weeks of probate being granted. That is a fundamentally different question from whether the estate's debts, taxes and liabilities have been ascertained and provided for.

What is the difference between having authority to administer the estate and being ready to distribute?

Authority to administer is a legal concept: the executor has the power to deal with the estate's assets and liabilities (granted by the will and confirmed by probate). Readiness to distribute is a practical and financial concept: the executor has identified all liabilities (including tax), provided for them, ascertained the residue and is confident that the proposed distribution will not leave the estate short. An executor can have full authority from the date of probate but not be safely ready to distribute the residue for another twelve to twenty-four months. Treating the two concepts as the same thing is the single biggest cause of over-distribution by inexperienced executors.

What tax liabilities does an executor have to think about before distributing?

At a minimum: (a) the deceased's final personal income tax return for the period from 1 July to the date of death; (b) any prior-year personal returns the deceased had not lodged; (c) the estate's trust tax returns (form TRT) for each year of administration; (d) capital gains tax on any sales by the executor during administration; (e) any superannuation death benefit tax payable by non-dependant beneficiaries on taxable-component lump sums; (f) any GST, PAYG, payroll tax or other business tax obligations of an unincorporated business held by the deceased; and (g) any HECS/HELP debts unpaid at death (which die with the deceased but should still be flagged). Specialist tax advice is essential before any material distribution.

What is the deceased's final personal tax return?

The deceased's final return (or 'date of death return') covers the period from 1 July of the year of death to the date of death. It reports the deceased's pre-death income, deductions, capital gains and franking credits in the usual way and is lodged under the deceased's TFN. The executor is responsible for lodging the return and for paying any tax assessed. The return is often refundable (PAYG instalments and salary withholding for a part-year typically exceed the part-year tax liability), but it can also produce a balancing debit if the deceased had untaxed investment income. Lodgement is usually due by 31 October following the death, or by the normal due date applicable to the deceased's tax agent.

What is an estate income tax return?

From the day after death onwards, the estate is treated as a separate trust for income tax purposes. The executor lodges a trust tax return (form TRT) under the estate's own TFN for each year of administration. The estate return reports income (interest, dividends, rent, managed-fund distributions, business income), deductions, capital gains and the allocation of net income between presently entitled beneficiaries (taxed under section 97 in their own hands), beneficiaries under a disability (taxed in the trustee's hands under section 98), and amounts assessed to the trustee under sections 99 or 99A where no beneficiary is presently entitled. See our companion articles on{' '}who pays tax on estate income and when an estate income tax return is required.

What CGT issues should the executor consider before distributing?

Death itself is not a CGT event — Division 128 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 rolls over the deceased's cost base to the executor and (on later transfer) to the beneficiary. However, several CGT issues need to be resolved before final distribution: (a) the cost base of every CGT asset must be reconstructed and documented, ideally with corroborating records; (b) any sale by the executor during administration is a CGT event in the estate's hands and must be reported in the estate's return; (c) the two-year main residence exemption window for an inherited dwelling runs from the date of death; and (d) post-death dividend reinvestment plan (DRP) allocations are estate acquisitions, not inherited assets, and have their own cost base. Distributing before CGT is calculated risks an under-retention for tax.

What about superannuation death benefit tax?

Superannuation paid to the estate is not part of the estate for succession-law purposes in the same way as the deceased's other assets, but it does interact with the estate's tax position. Where super is paid through the estate to a non-dependant beneficiary (for example, an adult independent child), the taxable component is generally taxed in the trustee's hands at 15% plus Medicare (or 30% plus Medicare for any untaxed element). The executor must ensure that the tax payable on the super is retained from the relevant beneficiary's distribution, not paid out of the residue, otherwise other beneficiaries effectively subsidise the non-dependant's tax. This is a common source of beneficiary disputes after distribution.

Does the estate need its own TFN?

Yes. The executor should apply for a separate TFN for the estate as soon as it begins to derive income that will need to be reported. The deceased's personal TFN cannot be used for estate returns. The estate's TFN is also used to provide TFN withholding details to banks, share registries and managed-fund trustees, so that no TFN-withholding tax (currently 47%) is deducted from estate interest and unfranked dividend income. Failing to set up the estate's TFN early causes immediate cash-flow problems and is a routine cause of refund delays at the end of administration.

Why is ATO correspondence so important before distribution?

ATO assessments can take months to issue after a return is lodged. Even after assessment, an ATO review or amendment can be raised within the usual amendment period (two or four years depending on the taxpayer's circumstances, longer in cases of fraud or evasion). An executor who distributes the residue without waiting for the ATO's final position on the lodged returns is gambling that no assessment will issue, and no amendment will be made, that exceeds the amount retained. For high-value estates, for estates with complex investments, or for estates with overseas income or assets, this gamble is not a gamble worth taking.

How much should an executor retain for tax and expenses?

Enough to comfortably cover: (a) the best estimate of the remaining tax liabilities (final personal return, estate returns, CGT, super tax); (b) a margin for ATO amendment risk; (c) remaining administration expenses (legal, accounting, valuation, registry, conveyancing); (d) any foreshadowed litigation (a TFM claim is a strong reason to retain everything); and (e) a contingency for late-emerging creditors. There is no fixed percentage — the retention is fact-specific. For straightforward estates an accountant can quantify the retention precisely; for complex estates the executor should err on the side of over-retention. Releasing a retention to beneficiaries once final assessments issue is straightforward; clawing back an over-distribution is not.

What is an interim distribution?

An interim distribution is a partial distribution to one or more beneficiaries before the estate is finally administered. It is typically a percentage of each residuary beneficiary's expected entitlement, paid once the executor is satisfied that the estate is solvent and the remaining retention is sufficient. Interim distributions are common in estates that take more than twelve months to administer, particularly where beneficiaries have a legitimate need for funds. They should be documented in writing, accompanied by an acknowledgement that the amount is on account of the beneficiary's final entitlement, and accompanied by a retention statement explaining how much is held back and why.

When are interim distributions appropriate?

Typically once: (a) probate has been granted; (b) the executor has a clear picture of the estate's assets and liabilities; (c) the deceased's final personal return is lodged (or at least the executor has a reliable estimate of the position); (d) major liabilities have been quantified; (e) the residue is clearly more than sufficient to cover the proposed interim distribution plus all foreseeable tax, expenses and contingencies; and (f) no litigation is foreshadowed or on foot. Where any of those conditions is not satisfied, the executor should defer or limit the interim distribution and document the reasoning.

What is a final distribution?

A final distribution is the payment that closes out a beneficiary's entitlement (or in the case of the last distribution, that closes out the estate). The executor should not make a final distribution until: (a) every tax return has been lodged and assessed; (b) every ATO refund has been received; (c) all administration expenses have been paid; (d) the residue has been recalculated; (e) the executor has obtained accounting sign-off; and (f) the executor has obtained a beneficiary release (or filed accounts in court if any beneficiary refuses to sign). Final distributions are by definition not reversible without litigation, so the standard for 'ready to make a final distribution' is much higher than for an interim distribution.

What is a beneficiary indemnity?

A beneficiary indemnity is a written undertaking by the beneficiary to repay any over-distribution if the estate's liabilities turn out to exceed the amount retained. A well-drafted indemnity should: (a) identify the distribution and the basis on which it is being paid; (b) confirm that the beneficiary understands the distribution is on account of (or in full satisfaction of) their entitlement; (c) require the beneficiary to repay any over-distribution within a stated period if called upon; and (d) be signed before the distribution is paid. Indemnities are not a substitute for adequate retention — a beneficiary who has spent the money or moved overseas may not be able to repay — but they do strengthen the executor's hand and the firm's recovery position if things go wrong.

Can an executor be personally liable for unpaid estate tax?

Yes. The executor (as legal personal representative) is personally liable to the ATO for tax assessed on the deceased's final return and on the estate's trust returns to the extent of the assets the executor has received or could have received in that capacity. If the executor distributes the estate without retaining enough for tax and the ATO later issues a debit assessment, the ATO can pursue the executor personally — the executor cannot point to the beneficiaries and walk away. The deceased's tax debts do not 'die with the deceased' to the extent the executor has had assets pass through their hands. This is the central risk that drives careful executors to retain generously and to wait for final ATO clearance before final distribution.

What are the risks of over-distribution?

Over-distribution risks include: (a) personal liability of the executor to the ATO and to unpaid creditors; (b) the practical impossibility of clawing back funds from beneficiaries who have spent them; (c) inequity between beneficiaries where one beneficiary's share has been used to absorb a late liability that should have been borne by all; (d) litigation between the executor and beneficiaries, with all its cost consequences; and (e) reputational and professional exposure for executors who are professionals (solicitors, accountants, trustee companies). Over-distribution is also the principal way that executors who otherwise administer estates competently end up sued.

How should an executor handle pressure from beneficiaries?

Communicate early, communicate often, and communicate in writing. Beneficiaries put pressure on executors because they do not understand the tax timetable, because they have a genuine financial need or because they distrust the executor. The executor's defensive response should not be silence — it should be a written explanation of: (a) where the administration is up to; (b) what tax returns remain to be lodged and assessed; (c) what retention the executor proposes to hold; (d) whether an interim distribution can be made now; and (e) the realistic timetable for final distribution. A formal interim distribution with an indemnity, accompanied by a clear retention statement, is usually a better answer to pressure than refusing to distribute anything.

What if estate litigation (such as a TFM claim) is on foot?

Where TFM family-provision litigation, a probate caveat or a will-validity challenge is foreshadowed or filed, the executor should distribute nothing without legal advice. In Victoria, section 99A of the Administration and Probate Act 1958 (Vic) prevents the executor from distributing the estate within six months of the grant of probate without leave of the court if a TFM claim has been notified. Outside that statutory window, distributing while litigation is on foot exposes the executor to personal liability if the litigation succeeds and the estate has insufficient funds to meet the order. See our article on time limits for TFM claims for the statutory framework.

What practical risk-management steps should executors take?

(1) Get accounting advice at the start of administration, not at the end. (2) Apply for the estate's TFN immediately. (3) Provide TFN withholding details to all financial institutions. (4) Lodge the deceased's final return promptly. (5) Lodge estate returns each year and obtain assessments before relying on retention figures. (6) Document every distribution decision in writing, including the retention calculation. (7) Obtain beneficiary indemnities for every interim distribution. (8) Do not pay the executor's commission until final distribution. (9) Obtain accounting and legal sign-off on the final distribution plan. (10) Keep all records for the longer of seven years and the period of beneficiaries' minority plus a buffer.

When should an executor obtain legal and accounting advice?

Legal advice should be obtained at the start of administration, again before any material interim distribution, and again before the final distribution. Accounting advice should be obtained at the start of administration (to set up TFNs and reporting), at each tax return cycle, and at the point the executor is considering closing the estate. Executors of any estate with business interests, significant CGT assets, post-death dividend reinvestment, overseas beneficiaries, contested wills or super death benefits should treat both disciplines as compulsory, not optional. The cost of the advice is dwarfed by the cost of an over-distribution that triggers ATO recovery against the executor personally.

Probate & Deceased Estates

Need Advice on Distributing a Deceased Estate?

We act for executors, beneficiaries, accountants and families across Australia on the legal aspects of administering a deceased estate — including the timing of interim and final distributions, retention calculations, beneficiary indemnities, ATO correspondence and the management of beneficiary pressure during a long administration.

← Back to the Information Centre

This article is general information only and does not constitute legal or taxation advice. Please obtain advice tailored to your circumstances.