Information Centre · Property & Conveyancing

Owners Corporation Disputes in Victoria: Rights, Responsibilities and Resolution Options

Owners corporation disputes affect many thousands of Victorian apartment and townhouse owners — from contested fees and repairs to building defects, water leaks, short-stay accommodation, pets and committee decision-making. This guide explains how owners corporations work, the most common disputes and the practical pathways for resolving them proportionately.

Dog on an apartment balcony illustrating common owners corporation disputes involving pets, noise and nuisance.
Noise complaints, pets, nuisance behaviour and by-law disputes are common sources of conflict within Victorian owners corporations.
By Parke Lawyers Editorial TeamReviewed by JULIAN McINTYRE, AssociateLast reviewed

Key points

  • An owners corporation is the legal entity automatically created on subdivision under the Subdivision Act 1988 (Vic) and governed by the Owners Corporations Act 2006 (Vic) and the Owners Corporations Regulations 2018 (Vic); every lot owner is a member by virtue of ownership, and the OC, committee, chairperson, manager, lot owners, occupiers and tenants have distinct roles under the Act, the rules and (for tenants) the Residential Tenancies Act 1997 (Vic).
  • The boundary between common property and private lot property is fixed by the registered plan of subdivision and is the starting point for who must repair and control an item; it is not a complete answer to who insures the item or who is liable for consequential damage, which turn on the current insurance policy, the statutory regime, causation, negligence and subrogation.
  • Annual fees are struck at general meeting on the basis of a budget and generally allocated by lot liability under the Owners Corporations Act 2006 (Vic); the Act's benefit-principle exceptions apply to fees for services from which some lots do not benefit and to fees for damage or misuse, but do not override lot liability at large — significant special fees generally require a special resolution rather than an ordinary committee decision.
  • Repair, maintenance and access powers (including under section 46) sit with the OC for common property and services that are its responsibility; lot owners have their own statutory duty not to damage common property or unreasonably interfere with it and to permit lawful access, and not every leak, defect or service belongs to the OC.
  • From 1 July 2025 the Building and Plumbing Commission replaced the Victorian Building Authority (absorbing the former DBDRV service), and from 1 July 2026 the new Home Warranty scheme replaced Domestic Building Insurance for eligible new domestic building work while legacy DBI policies continue on their terms; Home Warranty generally concerns eligible work and buildings up to three storeys, so higher-rise defect claims often turn on BPC rectification, developer/builder/practitioner claims, any applicable developer bond regime and other insurance rather than on Home Warranty; the 10-year long-stop in section 134 of the Building Act 1993 (Vic) runs from the occupancy permit or certificate of final inspection, and separate contract, negligence and Australian Consumer Law limitation periods can apply.
  • Sections 144–150 of the Owners Corporations Act 2006 (Vic) create statutory inspection and copy rights over prescribed records; on current Consumer Affairs Victoria guidance inspection of the register is free while copying fees may apply, general privacy concerns do not permit withholding or redacting otherwise inspectable records at will, and in exceptional circumstances VCAT can restrict access to personal information for a limited period.
  • Every owners corporation must have an internal grievance procedure (Schedule 3 model by default); completing it is often sensible but is not a universal precondition to VCAT for every applicant under section 163 — when the OC pursues an alleged breach under sections 152–159, section 153 requires it to follow the process and section 164 allows VCAT to strike out non-compliance, whereas fee recovery follows sections 31–32 and section 163(2) and is expressly excluded from section 153 by section 153(1A); CAV has an information and regulatory role (with Director powers under sections 160–161) and directs parties to the Dispute Settlement Centre of Victoria for consensual resolution, which is not compulsory before VCAT.
  • VCAT is the principal forum for binding determination under Part 11, with a broad remedial power under section 165 subject to the specific statutory source of each remedy — appointment or removal of an owners corporation manager, appointment or removal of the chairperson or secretary, and appointment of an administrator are distinct powers; section 166 provides a civil-penalty mechanism for binding rule breaches in defined circumstances, but not every rule breach is automatically penalised, no outcome or costs order can be guaranteed, and enforcement is a separate step under the VCAT Act 1998 (Vic) or in the courts.

A South Yarra apartment owner receives a special fee notice for a share of an urgent cladding rectification project resolved at a meeting they did not attend. A Brunswick townhouse owner is told by the manager that the persistent leak through their ceiling is "a private lot issue" and not the owners corporation's problem. A Docklands committee discovers that the building manager has been quietly approving short-stay arrangements in several lots for years. An executor administering a deceased estate finds the apartment hard to sell until a substantial building defect claim against the developer is resolved.

These are routine Victorian owners corporation disputes. They turn on a body of statute, regulations and rules that most owners read for the first time only when something goes wrong. Understanding the framework — and the resolution options between a polite email and the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal — materially improves outcomes and proportionality of cost.

This article explains what an owners corporation is, the boundary between common property and private lot property, the common disputes about fees, repairs, water leaks, defects, short-stay, noise, pets, parking, committee decision-making, conflicts of interest, access to records and manager performance, and the practical dispute-resolution pathways through internal processes, Consumer Affairs Victoria and VCAT. It is general information current as at 22 July 2026 and is not legal advice.

What an owners corporation is

An owners corporation (formerly a body corporate) is the legal entity automatically created when land is subdivided into two or more lots with common property under the Subdivision Act 1988 (Vic). It is governed principally by the Owners Corporations Act 2006 (Vic) and the Owners Corporations Regulations 2018 (Vic). Every lot owner is a member by virtue of ownership — membership is not optional and cannot be opted out of.

The owners corporation is a separate legal person; it is not the same as the committee, the chairperson, the manager or any individual lot owner. Its core functions include managing, repairing and insuring the common property; enforcing its rules; raising and recovering fees from members; keeping the required financial and other records; and acting in the interests of the members as a whole. It exercises those functions through general meetings, an elected committee (where one is required or has been established) and, in most buildings, a professional manager appointed under a written contract of appointment.

Tiers of owners corporation

The Regulations classify owners corporations into tiers, with different compliance obligations depending on the tier. Broadly, larger owners corporations have more onerous obligations (including long-term maintenance plan and maintenance-fund obligations for higher tiers) while very small subdivisions are subject to a lighter compliance regime. The exact tier thresholds and the obligations attaching to each tier are set by the current Regulations and change from time to time; owners and purchasers should confirm the current tier and its consequences with the manager or with a property lawyer rather than assuming a particular threshold.

Common property versus private lot property

The boundary between common propertyand private lot property is defined by the registered plan of subdivision lodged under the Subdivision Act 1988 (Vic) and by any endorsed plan notations. The plan is the source of truth — not the building's appearance, not the manager's view and not what feels reasonable.

Depending on how the plan is drawn, common property may include some or all of: driveways, foyers, lifts, stairs, gardens, roofs, structural elements, external building fabric and services serving more than one lot. Private lot property typically includes the cubic space inside the lot as shown on the plan and services exclusively serving that lot. Borderline items — balcony tiles or balustrades, windows and frames, front doors, hot water services, exhaust ducts, air-conditioning units, planter boxes — vary from plan to plan. The plan is the starting point for who must repair and control an item; it is not a complete answer to who must insure it, and it does not by itself determine liability for consequential damage, which turn on the current insurance policy, the statutory regime, causation, negligence and subrogation. Where there is doubt, the plan and any registered rules should be reviewed before money is spent on the assumption that another party is responsible.

Repairs, maintenance and s 46

The owners corporation must repair and maintain the common property and the services that are its responsibility, and has statutory powers (including under section 46 of the Owners Corporations Act 2006 (Vic)) to enter a lot in defined circumstances to carry out necessary works. Lot owners have their own statutory duty not to damage common property or unreasonably interfere with the OC's use of common property, and to allow lawful access. Not every defect, service, pipe or fixture belongs to the OC; the plan and the facts determine responsibility. Common flashpoints include the standard and timing of common works, recovery of costs from a lot owner whose conduct has damaged common property, and the interaction with insurance.

Fees, special fees and the benefit principle

The Owners Corporations Act 2006 (Vic) provides for three broad kinds of levy: annual fees set at a general meeting on the basis of a budget; special fees raised for extraordinary expenditure; and fees for services used only by particular lots or for damage or misuse caused by a particular lot or occupier. Annual and special fees are generally allocated in accordance with lot liability recorded on the plan of subdivision. The Act includes benefit-principle exceptions — for example, fees for services from which some lots do not benefit may be allocated differently, and fees for damage or misuse can be recovered from the responsible party — but the benefit principle does not override lot liability in every case, and cannot be used to re-allocate ordinary annual fees at large.

Significant special fees generally require a special resolution at general meeting rather than a committee decision. The Act and Regulations prescribe fee notices, interest on unpaid fees, recovery procedures and (subject to eligibility) payment plans. Owners who consider a fee unlawful or excessive can dispute it through internal dispute resolution, seek Consumer Affairs Victoria conciliation where available, or apply to VCAT for orders. Withholding a disputed fee is generally not a safe strategy: interest and recovery costs may accrue and the OC can sue for the debt, so the challenge should ordinarily be pursued in parallel with paying under protest or on terms.

Water leaks

Water leak disputes are among the most common and most expensive owners corporation issues. The first step is usually to identify the source (with an appropriate plumber's or building consultant's report) and to address ongoing damage promptly. Liability for repair and for consequential damage turns on where the leak originates and on the facts, not on any universal rule that the OC or the lot owner pays. A leak from common property (for example, a common roof, a shared stack or common drainage) is generally the OC's responsibility; a leak from within a private lot (for example, an appliance, a flexible hose or a shower membrane) is generally the lot owner's responsibility. Insurance under the OC policy and any individual contents policy may respond in parallel; the excess and any recovery follow the policy terms and the facts.

Building defects

Domestic building defects in newer Victorian developments may give rise to claims under the Domestic Building Contracts Act 1995 (Vic), the Building Act 1993 (Vic), the common law and, where applicable, the Australian Consumer Law. The owners corporation generally has standing under the Owners Corporations Act 2006 (Vic) to pursue defects affecting common property, and lot owners may have their own claims for defects affecting their lots. Not every defect claim belongs against the OC or another lot owner — many are properly directed to the builder, the developer, a registered building practitioner or the insurer.

From 1 July 2025 the Building and Plumbing Commission (BPC) replaced the Victorian Building Authority and absorbed the former Domestic Building Dispute Resolution Victoria service, and now exercises the current regulatory and dispute-resolution/rectification powers over eligible domestic building work. From 1 July 2026 the new Home Warranty scheme replaced Domestic Building Insurance for eligible new domestic building work; legacy DBI policies continue on their own terms. Home Warranty generally concerns eligible work and buildings up to three storeys, so higher-rise apartment defect claims often turn on BPC rectification and regulatory powers, developer/builder/practitioner claims, any applicable developer bond regime and other insurance rather than on Home Warranty. An owners corporation does not automatically hold Home Warranty cover simply because the building is new. The ten-year long-stop under section 134 of the Building Act 1993 (Vic) runs from the issue of the occupancy permit or the certificate of final inspection, and separate limitation periods apply to contract, negligence and Australian Consumer Law claims. A defects strategy usually involves an independent expert report, written notification, an insurance/BPC pathway assessment and, if unresolved, proceedings within the applicable limitation periods.

Insurance

The owners corporation is required to hold reinstatement and replacement building insurance and public liability insurance in accordance with the Act and Regulations. In multi-level developments and other prescribed cases the OC's building insurance can cover buildings and improvements affecting lots as well as common property, not only structures on common property. Whether a particular claim is met, how the excess is allocated and who is ultimately responsible are not fixed by any universal rule — they depend on the policy wording, the statutory regime, the plan, causation, negligence, subrogation and the facts. A recurring source of dispute is who wears the excess on a claim caused by a lot owner or occupier; documentation and prompt notification matter, and neither the OC nor the lot owner should assume the answer without checking the policy.

Short-stay, noise, pets and other conduct

Conduct is regulated by the model rules in Schedule 2 of the Owners Corporations Regulations 2018 (Vic), any additional consolidated rules the OC has registered, the planning scheme, any registered restrictive covenant (see our guide on restrictive covenants on Victorian property), applicable local laws and — for tenants — the Residential Tenancies Act 1997 (Vic). Registered special rules must be consistent with the Act and other law; a rule that purports to override the Act or general law is not enforceable.

Short-stay accommodation is addressed by the Owners Corporations and Other Acts Amendment (Short-Stay Accommodation) Act 2018 (Vic), which allows the OC to seek compensation for losses arising from unruly short-stay conduct but does not generally allow the OC to prohibit short-stay by rule alone; a Victorian short-stay levy has been introduced separately. A blanket "no pets" rule is difficult to sustain and any refusal must be reasonable on the facts. The typical enforcement sequence for any rule breach is an informal approach, a written breach notice under the Act, internal dispute resolution and, if unresolved, a VCAT application.

Parking and storage

Parking and storage disputes turn on whether the space in question is an accessory lot attached to a principal lot on the plan, part of common property subject to any exclusive-use right or lawful allocation, or unallocated common property. Misuse — particularly long-term storage on common driveways or the use of visitor bays by residents — is a routine flashpoint and is usually addressed through rule enforcement and, if necessary, VCAT.

Meetings, committees, votes and resolutions

The Act and Regulations set the procedure for calling and holding annual and special general meetings, for elections and functions of the committee, for the taking of ballots and proxies and for the passing of resolutions. Depending on the provision engaged, a decision may require an ordinary resolution, a special resolution or (in limited cases) a unanimous resolution, with different quorum, voting and lot-entitlement rules. Exact thresholds should be checked in the current Act and Regulations rather than treated as constants — special-resolution thresholds and the treatment of proxies and unfinancial members have been the subject of reform. Distinguishing votes cast, lot entitlements and eligible voters is essential in close matters and in later challenges.

Committee decision-making and conflicts of interest

Committee members owe statutory duties of good faith and due care and diligence, must not make improper use of information obtained as a committee member, and must disclose material personal interests in matters being decided. Decisions affected by undisclosed conflicts can be challenged. Significant matters (special fees above the prescribed threshold, changes to common property, changes to lot entitlements or liabilities, and certain rule changes) must be put to members at general meeting or by ballot and cannot be decided by the committee alone.

Access to records

Sections 144–150 of the Owners Corporations Act 2006 (Vic) create statutory rights of inspection and copy over prescribed owners corporation records — including the register of lot owners and occupiers, minutes and resolutions, financial statements, contracts, the current insurance policy and prescribed correspondence — within statutory timeframes. On current Consumer Affairs Victoria guidance, inspection of the register is free; copying fees may apply to copies of records, and an owners corporation certificate and copies are a separate statutory product with their own prescribed fee. General privacy concerns do not permit the OC or the manager to withhold or redact otherwise inspectable records at will. The Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) does not apply to every owners corporation (turnover and other threshold questions arise) and does not automatically displace the statutory access regime. In exceptional circumstances the Act permits VCAT to restrict access to personal information for a limited period, and legal advice or litigation-privileged material may require separate analysis before it is withheld — a categorical assertion of privilege is not itself authority to refuse. Unreasonable refusal or delay is itself a breach and can be pursued through internal dispute resolution and VCAT.

Managers and contracts of appointment

Most Victorian owners corporations appoint a registered owners corporation manager under a written contract. Managers owe statutory duties (including good faith, due care and diligence and disclosure) and their functions are governed by both the Act and the contract. Common flashpoints include the scope of services and fees, unauthorised expenditure, undisclosed commissions or benefits, insurance and repair procurement arrangements, debt-recovery performance, refusal to convene meetings, and procedure on termination. An OC can terminate a manager in accordance with the Act and the contract and, in serious cases, can apply to VCAT for orders (including for the appointment of an administrator). Owners with concerns should obtain the current contract and recent invoices before formalising the dispute.

Internal dispute resolution

Every owners corporation must have an internal grievance procedure. The model procedure in Schedule 3 of the Owners Corporations Regulations 2018 (Vic) applies by default unless the OC has registered its own compliant procedure. The steps typically require a written complaint, notice to the party complained about, an opportunity to be heard and a documented outcome. Attempting the internal process first is often sensible and is what Consumer Affairs Victoria recommends, but completion of the OC's grievance procedure is not a universal jurisdictional precondition for every applicant under section 163 of the Act. Whether it is required depends on who is applying (lot owner, occupier, manager, former owner, mortgagee, insurer or the OC itself), the specific relief sought and the statutory pathway engaged.

Where an owners corporation itself decides to pursue an alleged breach against a lot owner or occupier under sections 152–159, section 153 requires it to follow the applicable process; if the OC does not comply, section 164 allows VCAT to dismiss or strike out an OC application seeking rectification of that breach. Fee recovery follows the separate pathway in sections 31–32 and the section 163(2) final-notice process and is expressly excluded from section 153 by section 153(1A). Genuinely urgent relief (for example, urgent injunction, safety or access relief) is not the only exception — some other applicants and heads of relief simply do not engage the OC grievance procedure at all.

Consumer Affairs Victoria and the Dispute Settlement Centre

Consumer Affairs Victoria (CAV) has an information and regulatory role for owners corporations, and the Director of Consumer Affairs Victoria exercises statutory powers under sections 160–161 of the Act. Current CAV public guidance directs parties who want help with consensual resolution to the Dispute Settlement Centre of Victoria (DSCV), a free service that offers information and, where both parties agree, mediation. Neither CAV nor DSCV can make binding orders, and DSCV mediation is not compulsory before VCAT. Separate causes of action (for example, a related tenancy, building or consumer-law claim) may have their own preconditions in their own jurisdictions.

VCAT proceedings and orders

The Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal is the principal forum for binding determination of owners corporation disputes under Part 11 of the Owners Corporations Act 2006 (Vic). Section 165 gives VCAT a broad power to make any order it considers fair, subject to the Act. Depending on the specific statutory power engaged, orders may include:

  • Recovery of unpaid fees and enforcement of debt;
  • Compliance with the Act, the Regulations and the rules;
  • Rectification, repair or maintenance of common property;
  • Injunction-like orders restraining or requiring conduct;
  • Access to records;
  • Removal of unauthorised works affecting common property;
  • Compensation for loss or damage;
  • Variation, invalidation or enforcement of rules and resolutions; and
  • Appointment or removal of an owners corporation manager, appointment or removal of the chairperson or secretary, or appointment of an administrator, in each case under the particular statutory power that authorises the relief sought.

The appointment/removal of a manager, of officeholders (chairperson or secretary) and of an administrator are distinct remedies with distinct statutory sources; section 165 should not be treated as a general authority for every governance remedy without checking the applicable power. Where binding rules are breached, section 166 provides a civil-penalty mechanism in defined circumstances, but not every rule breach is automatically penalised. Applications are made on the relevant VCAT form with supporting evidence, and many matters settle at a compulsory conference or mediation before final hearing. Enforcement of a VCAT order is a separate step under the VCAT Act 1998 (Vic) or in the courts as applicable. Recoverability of any judgment depends on the respondent's solvency and any available security.

Costs and practical risk management

Parties generally bear their own costs in the Owners Corporations List unless a costs power is exercised; special costs orders can be made for unreasonable conduct. Building defect and complex matters routinely involve expert evidence — building consultants, plumbers, structural engineers, valuers, accountants — and this drives most of the cost over the life of the matter. Owners considering a dispute should weigh the realistic value at stake against the likely costs, the time commitment, the impact on relationships in the building and the risk that even a favourable order may be difficult to enforce. Our companion guide on the costs consequences of Victorian litigation is useful reading before any major escalation, and our broader guides on buying property in Victoria and selling property in Victoria cover the surrounding conveyancing framework. Title-level issues that may overlap with owners corporation disputes include easements on Victorian property, property boundary and fencing disputes, caveat removal in Victoria and the restrictive covenants guide referenced above.

When to get legal advice

Legal advice is worth obtaining before signing a contract to buy a strata lot; before issuing or responding to a breach notice; before voting on significant special fees, rule changes or changes to common property; before serving or receiving a building defect notice; before appointing or terminating a manager; before commencing or responding to VCAT proceedings; on any committee decision that could later be challenged for authority, process or conflict of interest; and when selling or administering a deceased estate apartment with unresolved owners corporation issues. Early advice is materially cheaper than late advice and generally preserves more options.

Who this affects

Apartment and townhouse owners are exposed to unexpected fees, prolonged repair disputes, water damage and committee decisions that affect the value and amenity of the home. Committee members are exposed to statutory duty, conflict and process risk; the practical protection is documenting decisions, disclosing interests and seeking advice on significant matters. Managers face contract-performance, disclosure and reputational exposure and should invest in robust contracts and proactive communication. Landlords can face tenancy claims for uninhabitable premises when the OC fails to repair. Purchasers need due diligence on the OC (fees, minutes, insurance, defect and litigation history, short-stay use) that is at least as thorough as inspecting the lot itself. Executors commonly need to triage unresolved OC issues before an estate apartment can be sold.

How Parke Lawyers can help

Parke Lawyers advises Victorian lot owners, committees, owners corporations, managers, landlords, purchasers and executors on the full range of owners corporation issues — fees and special fees, repairs and maintenance, common-property and lot-property boundaries, water leaks, building defects, short-stay, noise, pets, parking, manager performance and termination, access to records, internal dispute resolution, Consumer Affairs Victoria conciliation, VCAT applications and enforcement. Our conveyancing and property and litigation and dispute resolution teams work together so a matter can move proportionately from rule interpretation and committee strategy to negotiation, conciliation or contested VCAT proceedings where required. We do not promise particular outcomes or costs orders, and we do not offer 24/7 or after-hours telephone advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is an owners corporation in Victoria, and how does it differ from the manager, committee and lot owners?

An owners corporation (formerly a body corporate) is the legal entity automatically created when land is subdivided into lots and common property under the Subdivision Act 1988 (Vic). It is governed by the Owners Corporations Act 2006 (Vic) and the Owners Corporations Regulations 2018 (Vic). Every lot owner is a member by virtue of ownership — membership is not opt-in. The owners corporation is a separate legal person; the committee is an internal body that exercises delegated functions between general meetings; the chairperson and secretary are officeholders with prescribed roles; a professional manager is engaged under a contract of appointment and exercises only the functions delegated by the OC or the Act; and lot owners, occupiers and tenants have their own distinct rights and obligations under the Act, the rules and (for tenants) the Residential Tenancies Act 1997 (Vic).

How is common property distinguished from private lot property, and why does it matter?

The boundary between common property and private lot property is fixed by the registered plan of subdivision — not by what feels sensible, not by the manager's opinion and not by the building's appearance. Whether a wall, floor, ceiling, balcony surface, window, door, pipe, cable, hot water service or air-conditioning unit is common property or lot property depends on how the plan is drawn and any endorsed notations. The boundary is the starting point for who must repair and control an item. It is not a complete answer to who must insure it, and it does not by itself determine liability for consequential damage: OC building insurance under the Owners Corporations Act 2006 (Vic) can, in multi-level developments and other prescribed cases, cover buildings and improvements affecting lots as well as common property, and consequential-loss questions turn on the policy wording, causation, negligence, subrogation and the statutory regime. Where there is genuine doubt, the plan, the current insurance policy and any registered rules should be reviewed by a property lawyer before money is spent or an item is treated as somebody else's problem.

How are fees and special fees set, and what can owners do if they consider a fee unlawful or excessive?

Annual fees are set at a general meeting on the basis of a budget under the Owners Corporations Act 2006 (Vic) and are generally struck in accordance with lot liability recorded on the plan of subdivision, subject to the benefit-principle exceptions in the Act for fees for services from which some lots do not benefit and for fees for damage or misuse. Special fees for extraordinary expenditure must be authorised at general meeting and, above a prescribed threshold, generally require a special resolution rather than an ordinary committee decision. Owners who consider a fee unlawful or improperly authorised can raise it through internal dispute resolution, seek Consumer Affairs Victoria conciliation where available, or apply to VCAT for orders. Withholding a disputed fee is risky: interest and recovery costs may accrue and the OC can sue for the debt, so the challenge should ordinarily be pursued in parallel rather than by non-payment.

Who is responsible for water leaks between apartments or from common property?

Liability for a water leak turns on the plan, the facts and the insurance response — not on any rule of thumb that the OC always pays. If the leak originates from a common-property element (for example, a common roof, a shared waste stack or common drainage), the owners corporation is generally responsible for repair and may be responsible for consequential damage to lot property, subject to fault and to insurance terms. If the leak originates within a private lot (for example, a flexible hose, a shower membrane or an appliance) the relevant lot owner is generally responsible. An expert plumber's or building consultant's report identifying the source is usually the first practical step; parallel claims may exist under the OC's building insurance and individual contents policies, and the excess and any recovery are allocated according to the policy wording and the facts.

What can owners do about building defects, and how does the 2025–2026 regulatory reform affect claims?

Domestic building defects in newer Victorian developments may give rise to claims under the Domestic Building Contracts Act 1995 (Vic), the Building Act 1993 (Vic) and, where applicable, the Australian Consumer Law. The owners corporation generally has standing under the Owners Corporations Act 2006 (Vic) to pursue defects affecting common property. From 1 July 2025 the Building and Plumbing Commission (BPC) replaced the Victorian Building Authority and the former Domestic Building Dispute Resolution Victoria service, and now exercises the current regulatory and dispute-resolution/rectification powers over eligible domestic building work. From 1 July 2026 the new Home Warranty scheme replaced Domestic Building Insurance (DBI) for eligible new domestic building work while existing DBI policies continue on their terms; Home Warranty generally concerns eligible work and buildings up to three storeys, so higher-rise apartment defect claims often turn instead on BPC rectification and regulatory powers, developer/builder/practitioner claims, any applicable developer bond regime and other insurance rather than on Home Warranty. An owners corporation does not automatically hold Home Warranty cover simply because the building is new. The ten-year long-stop under section 134 of the Building Act 1993 (Vic) runs from the issue of the occupancy permit or the certificate of final inspection, and other limitation periods (including for contract, negligence and ACL claims) may apply. Not every defect is a claim against the OC or a lot owner — many are properly directed to the builder, the building practitioner, the insurer or the developer.

What rules apply to short-stay accommodation, noise, pets and other conduct disputes?

Conduct is regulated by the model rules in Schedule 2 of the Owners Corporations Regulations 2018 (Vic), any additional consolidated rules the OC has registered, the planning scheme, any restrictive covenant on the title, applicable local laws (including for noise) and, for tenants, the Residential Tenancies Act 1997 (Vic). Short-stay accommodation is addressed by the Owners Corporations and Other Acts Amendment (Short-Stay Accommodation) Act 2018 (Vic), which allows the OC to seek compensation for losses arising from unruly short-stay conduct but does not generally allow the OC to ban short-stay by rule alone; a Victorian short-stay levy has been introduced separately. A blanket "no pets" rule is difficult to sustain in the current framework and any refusal must be reasonable on the facts. Where a rule is breached, the typical sequence is an informal approach, a written breach notice under the Act, internal dispute resolution and, if unresolved, a VCAT application.

How does committee decision-making work, and how are conflicts of interest handled?

Most owners corporations elect a committee that acts within the delegations set out in the Act, the rules and any general-meeting resolutions. Committee members owe statutory duties of good faith and due care and diligence, and must disclose any material personal interest in a matter being decided — for example, where a member's business is a candidate for a repair contract. Decisions affected by undisclosed conflicts may be challenged. Significant matters (including special fees above the prescribed threshold, changes to common property, changes to lot entitlements or liabilities, and certain rule changes) must be put to members at a general meeting or by ballot, not decided by the committee alone; whether an ordinary resolution, special resolution or unanimous resolution is required, and the applicable quorum, voting and proxy rules, depend on the provision engaged and the current Regulations.

What records can a lot owner inspect, and what are the limits and fees?

Sections 144–150 of the Owners Corporations Act 2006 (Vic) create statutory inspection and copy rights over prescribed owners corporation records — including the register of lot owners and occupiers, minutes and resolutions, financial statements, contracts, the current insurance policy and prescribed correspondence — within statutory timeframes. On current Consumer Affairs Victoria guidance, inspection of the register is free while copying fees may apply to copies of records and separately to an owners corporation certificate. General privacy concerns do not permit the OC or manager to withhold or redact otherwise inspectable records at will: the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) does not apply to every owners corporation (turnover and other threshold questions arise) and does not automatically displace the statutory access regime. In exceptional circumstances the Act permits VCAT to restrict access to personal information for a limited period, and legal advice or litigation-privileged material may require separate analysis before it is withheld. Unreasonable refusal or delay is itself a breach and can be pursued through internal dispute resolution and VCAT.

Is internal dispute resolution mandatory before Consumer Affairs Victoria or VCAT, and what does it involve?

Every owners corporation must have an internal grievance procedure; the model procedure in Schedule 3 of the Owners Corporations Regulations 2018 (Vic) applies by default unless the OC has registered its own compliant procedure. The steps typically require a written complaint, notice to the party complained about, an opportunity to be heard and a documented outcome. It is often sensible to attempt the internal process first, but it is not a universal jurisdictional precondition for every applicant under section 163 of the Owners Corporations Act 2006 (Vic). Where an owners corporation itself decides to pursue an alleged breach against a lot owner or occupier under sections 152–159, section 153 requires it to follow the applicable process (fee recovery under sections 31–32 and the section 163(2) final-notice pathway is expressly excluded from section 153 by section 153(1A)); if the OC does not comply, section 164 allows VCAT to dismiss or strike out an application for rectification of that breach. Other applicants and other kinds of relief — including genuinely urgent injunction, safety or access relief — turn on their own statutory pathways rather than a general precondition. Consumer Affairs Victoria has an information and regulatory role and the Director exercises statutory powers under sections 160–161; current CAV public guidance directs parties who want assistance with consensual resolution to the Dispute Settlement Centre of Victoria (DSCV), whose service is not compulsory before VCAT.

What can VCAT do in an owners corporation dispute, and what are the practical cost and enforcement realities?

The Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal is the principal forum for binding determination of owners corporation disputes under Part 11 of the Owners Corporations Act 2006 (Vic), with a broad power under section 165 to make any order it considers fair, subject to the Act. Depending on the statutory power engaged, orders may include recovery of unpaid fees, compliance with the Act and the rules, rectification of common property, access to records, removal of unauthorised works, compensation and, in serious cases, appointment or removal of an owners corporation manager, appointment or removal of the chairperson or secretary, or appointment of an administrator — the particular office and remedy depend on the specific provision, and section 165 should not be treated as authority for every governance remedy without checking the applicable power. Where binding rules are breached, section 166 provides a civil-penalty mechanism in defined circumstances, but not every rule breach is automatically penalised. VCAT is designed to be more accessible than the higher courts and each party generally bears its own costs in the Owners Corporations List unless a costs power is exercised. Expert evidence (building consultants, engineers, plumbers, valuers, accountants) is common in defect and complex matters and drives most of the cost. No lawyer can guarantee a particular outcome, a costs order or the recoverability of any judgment against an insolvent respondent, and enforcement is a separate step under the VCAT Act 1998 (Vic) or in the courts as applicable.

Found this article helpful? Share it

LinkedInEmailFacebookX

For a clean PDF, choose Save as PDF, select A4, turn off Headers and footers, and turn on Background graphics.

Property & Conveyancing

Get advice early — before a committee escalation or a VCAT application.

Parke Lawyers advises Victorian lot owners, committees, owners corporations, managers and executors on the full range of owners corporation disputes under the Owners Corporations Act 2006 (Vic) — from fees, repairs and building defects to short-stay, noise, pets, parking, manager performance and VCAT proceedings.

← Back to the Information Centre

This article is general information only and does not constitute legal advice. Please obtain advice tailored to your circumstances.