Cooling-Off Rights When Buying Property in Victoria Explained

The statutory source: section 31 of the Sale of Land Act 1962 (Vic)

Section 31 of the Sale of Land Act 1962 (Vic) is the sole statutory source of the cooling-off right in Victoria for contracts for the sale of land. The right is not conferred by the contract itself, by the estate agent, or by any other general consumer-protection statute — it exists only because and to the extent that section 31 provides for it, and its scope, timing and consequences are all defined by the current text of section 31 read with the definitions elsewhere in the Act.

Cooling-off is a right of the purchaser, not of the vendor. It operates by allowing the purchaser to end an otherwise binding contract, on written notice, during a short statutory window after the purchaser signs. Outside that window, and outside the categories of purchaser and land to which section 31 applies, an ordinary contract for the sale of land is binding when signed and exchanged — the purchaser has no unilateral right to walk away merely because they have changed their mind.

The three clear business days: when the period begins and ends

Section 31 gives the purchaser three clear business days to end the contract, calculated from the day on which the purchaser signed the contract. The day the purchaser signed is not itself one of the three clear business days; time runs from the following business day. Saturdays, Sundays and Victorian public holidays are not business days and do not count. If a public holiday falls within the window (for example, Labour Day, Anzac Day, Melbourne Cup Day, King's Birthday, the AFL Grand Final Friday, or the Christmas/New Year period), the window extends correspondingly. Current Victorian public holiday dates should be checked before diarising the expiry.

The period is a right to end the contract, not a licence to serve the notice at any convenient time. Notice delivered late in the evening on the last day, or by a method that does not achieve receipt before the end of that day, is at risk of being treated as out of time. A purchaser who intends to cool off should give notice on an earlier day in the window and by a method that gives a clear record of receipt, rather than at the edge of the window on the last day. It is the purchaser's signing that starts the clock — the vendor's signing, exchange or counter-execution does not restart or extend the period, and neither does the timing of any deposit payment.

Written notice: to whom, how, and with what content

Section 31 requires written notice of termination given to the vendor or to the vendor's agent within the cooling-off period. The current statutory wording, together with any permitted mode of service under the contract and the Electronic Transactions (Victoria) Act 2000 (Vic), should be checked in each case. This article does not treat email, text message, telephone messages, social-media messages or verbal notice to an agent as universally valid modes of service — some may be effective in a given case and others may not, and reliance on any particular mode should be confirmed against the contract and the statute.

The safer practice is written notice prepared by the purchaser's lawyer and directed to the vendor's legal representative, with clear identification of the property, the contract (typically by parties and date), and unambiguous words of termination stating that the purchaser ends the contract under section 31 of the Sale of Land Act 1962 (Vic). Notice should be sent by a mode that produces evidence of dispatch and receipt (such as email with delivery confirmation, or a courier or postal service that provides tracking), and every step in the service chain should be documented and retained. Where a purchaser cannot obtain legal advice before the window closes, written notice should still be given rather than withheld — but the risk that a self-drafted notice fails on a technicality is real.

Vendor's statutory entitlement on cooling off

Where the purchaser validly ends the contract under section 31, the vendor's statutory entitlement under the current section 31 is the greater of $100 or 0.2% of the purchase price. This is not the full deposit; it is a capped deduction from money paid by the purchaser. Where the deposit already paid exceeds the statutory amount, the excess must be refunded; where the money paid is less than the statutory amount, section 31 does not authorise the vendor to pursue the purchaser for the shortfall as a separate debt (this should nevertheless be confirmed on the current wording and any relevant case law).

The statutory deduction is distinct from deposit forfeiture on default. A purchaser who cools off within time is not in default and does not forfeit the deposit beyond the section 31 amount; a purchaser who purports to terminate for reasons outside section 31 or after the window has expired may face a very different regime, including the vendor's rights on default under the contract and at general law. Money held in an estate agent's trust account under the Estate Agents Act 1980 (Vic) or in a lawyer's trust account is released in accordance with the applicable trust-account rules and any dispute between the parties; section 31 does not prescribe a fixed number of days within which the refund must be made, and this article does not promise a particular refund timeline.

The auction exclusion: publicly advertised auctions and the three-day windows

Section 31 does not apply where the land is purchased at a publicly advertised auction. On the current text of section 31, the exclusion also captures a contract for the sale of the same land entered into within the three clear business days before or after the publicly advertised auction. A private pre-auction or post-auction negotiation for the same land, signed within that window, is caught by the exclusion — moving the signing away from the auction room does not by itself restore cooling-off where the contract is signed within three clear business days of the publicly advertised auction of that land.

Whether a particular contract falls within the auction window is a factual question — the auction must have been publicly advertised, and the contract must be for the same land, and the timing must fall within the statutory three-day windows either side. Contracts entered into outside the statutory windows around a publicly advertised auction are not brought within the exclusion merely because the property was previously offered at auction. The current text of section 31 and current Consumer Affairs Victoria guidance should be checked in each case; the outcome cannot be assumed.

The other statutory exclusions

In addition to the auction exclusion, the current section 31 removes cooling-off in a defined set of further categories. Each of the following should be checked against the current statutory wording rather than paraphrased:

• land used primarily for industrial or commercial purposes;
• land more than 20 hectares in area used primarily for the business of farming — both limbs must be satisfied for the exclusion to apply;
• the purchaser is an estate agent as defined in the Act; or a body corporate;
• the purchaser has previously signed a contract for the sale of the same land in substantially the same terms.

Each exclusion is defined by the statutory wording and its scope should not be overextended. Mixed-use land (for example, a shop with a residence above) requires a fact-specific assessment of primary use. Rural land can fall on either side of the exclusion depending on area and the primary use of the land. The "previously signed a substantially similar contract" exclusion is fact-specific and can be triggered by a further contract signed after variations that do not change the substance of the transaction — legal advice should be obtained where a purchaser has signed more than one contract for the same land.

Nominee, company and trust purchasers

Whether the section 31 right is available depends on the identity of the legal purchaser named in and contracting under the contract, and on the statutory definitions in the Act. Signing personally as an individual and later nominating a company, trustee or another party is not a general device for gaining or preserving a cooling-off right that would not otherwise apply, and nomination carries separate stamp duty, contractual and representation consequences under the contract and the Duties Act 2000 (Vic) that must be considered independently. Where a purchase is intended for a corporate purchaser, a trust or a self-managed superannuation fund, the identity of the contracting party should be settled with legal advice before the contract is signed rather than assumed to be adjustable later.

Finance, inspections and other conditions

Cooling-off is not a finance condition, a building or pest inspection condition or a due diligence condition. The three clear business days do not extend because a purchaser is still waiting for finance approval, an inspection report, or legal advice, and the vendor is under no statutory obligation to grant an extension. Special conditions in the contract dealing with finance, inspection or due diligence operate under their own wording — with their own notice and deadline requirements — and are separate from the section 31 right. A purchaser who wants a longer period to make a decision should negotiate an appropriate contractual special condition before signing; relying on cooling-off as a substitute for such a condition is not safe.

Section 32 statements and rescission under sections 32–32K

The cooling-off right under section 31 is distinct from the purchaser's separate statutory rights in relation to the vendor's statement under sections 32–32K of the Sale of Land Act 1962 (Vic). Defective disclosure by the vendor does not automatically extend the cooling-off window and does not automatically entitle the purchaser to rescind — the statutory conditions in the relevant provisions must be met, and the analysis is different from the cooling-off analysis. Where a purchaser identifies a possible disclosure defect, the position under section 31 and the position under sections 32–32K should be assessed in parallel, and — where appropriate — the purchaser's position should be protected under both regimes rather than reduced to a choice between them without advice.

Vendor acceptance, exchange and formation of the contract

Section 31 speaks in terms of the day on which the purchaser signed the contract. It does not, on its face, key the cooling-off period to the vendor's signing, the counter-execution date, or the date of exchange, and this article does not restate the period on any such basis. Contract formation is a separate question governed by general contract law and by the contract's own terms; the purchaser's statutory period under section 31 is calculated from the purchaser's signing on the current wording of the section.

Deposits and refunds

The cooling-off deduction is not automatically the full deposit. Where a purchaser validly ends the contract, the statutory amount (the greater of $100 or 0.2% of the purchase price) is retained and the balance of money paid is refunded. The deposit is typically held in trust — either in an estate agent's trust account under the Estate Agents Act 1980 (Vic) or in a lawyer's trust account under the Legal Profession Uniform Law and the trust-account rules. Refund is subject to the applicable trust-account rules and to any dispute between the parties as to whether cooling-off was validly exercised; section 31 does not fix a maximum refund period and this article does not promise one.

Waiver and extension

Section 31 is a statutory right and cannot be prospectively waived or contracted out of in a way that is inconsistent with the section. A contractual clause purporting to shorten, exclude or override the right beyond what the statute allows is ineffective to that extent, and this article does not describe a "solicitor's certificate" or other private arrangement as capable of removing the statutory right where the statute does not permit it. Extension of the period by written agreement between the parties is a matter of contract and depends on the vendor's willingness; extension should be documented in writing before the original window closes.

Off-the-plan and new-home purchases

Whether section 31 applies to an off-the-plan or new-home purchase depends on the identity of the purchaser and the nature of the land, applying the section 31 exclusions in the ordinary way. Off-the-plan contracts are also subject to separate statutory regimes dealing with vendor disclosure, sunset provisions, deposit-trust rules and other specific rescission rights — these regimes operate independently of section 31 and should not be conflated with the cooling-off right. A purchaser considering an off-the-plan contract should obtain legal advice that addresses both the section 31 position and the separate off-the-plan regime rather than treating them as a single set of rights.

Foreign purchasers, first-home buyers and investors

Section 31 does not confer a different cooling-off right because a purchaser is a first-home buyer, an investor or a foreign resident. The ordinary statutory test applies — the identity of the purchaser and the nature of the land are what determine whether section 31 is engaged and whether any exclusion removes it. Foreign investment review, additional duty and land-tax surcharges, first-home buyer duty concessions and the like are governed by separate regimes and are not part of the cooling-off analysis.

Consequences of a valid cooling-off notice

A valid cooling-off notice ends the contract of sale under section 31. The parties are then in the position that section 31 provides for — the vendor is entitled to retain the statutory amount and the balance of any money paid must be refunded. The consequences for related arrangements (for example, deposit bonds, guarantees, title dealings that pre-date settlement, or ancillary agreements) are not automatic — each depends on the terms of the arrangement, the state of the transaction and the general law, and requires separate analysis rather than an assumption that everything unwinds at the moment of termination. Where the vendor disputes that cooling-off was validly exercised, the release of the deposit and the practical consequences of termination may be affected by that dispute.

Practical urgency and getting legal advice

The cooling-off window is short, and once it has closed the purchaser generally cannot recover it. A purchaser who has just signed a contract should obtain legal advice immediately — not at the end of the third business day — so that the section 31 position, the section 32 disclosure position and any contract-specific issues can be assessed while the window is still open. This article does not promise a particular turnaround time from any law firm; it recommends taking advice as soon as the contract is signed and giving the notice, if the purchaser decides to end the contract, well before the last day of the window.

Parke Lawyers' property and conveyancing team acts for Victorian purchasers on cooling-off, section 32 review and related rescission questions. See our conveyancing and property services page, contact Julian McIntyre directly, or read our related guides on easements, restrictive covenants and caveat removal.

Frequently Asked Questions