Information Centre · Commercial & Business Law
Retail Lease Disputes in Victoria
Retail lease disputes in Victoria almost always turn on how the parties handle notices, evidence and the VSBC referral process — not on the substantive law. This landlord- and tenant-focused guide sets out the dispute pathways, the most common flashpoints, and the practical steps that resolve or narrow retail lease disputes without a full VCAT hearing.

Key points
- Retail lease disputes in Victoria are governed principally by the Retail Leases Act 2003 (Vic), the general law of contract, and — for referral to mediation and hearing — the Victorian Small Business Commission (VSBC) and VCAT under Part 10 of the Act.
- The most common disputes are rent and outgoings (including estimates versus actuals), repairs and maintenance responsibility, disclosure statement defects, market rent review process, options to renew and end-of-term make good.
- Section 87 of the Act requires most retail tenancy disputes to be referred to the VSBC for mediation before either party can commence proceedings at VCAT — commencing proceedings without a VSBC certificate is a common procedural misstep.
- Landlord notices of default must be strictly compliant — the Act, the lease and the Property Law Act 1958 (Vic) each impose form and content requirements, and a defective notice cannot support a termination or forfeiture even where the tenant is plainly in breach.
- Contemporaneous evidence — condition reports, photographs, outgoings reconciliations, correspondence and disclosure statements — is decisive; disputes are rarely won on submissions alone and evidence gaps generally favour the party in possession of the documents.
- Early legal advice is proportionate; VSBC mediation is inexpensive and resolves most disputes without a hearing, and a well-prepared negotiation position (with a fallback VCAT strategy) is almost always cheaper than a fully-run VCAT proceeding.
This article focuses on dispute handling under a retail lease that is within the Retail Leases Act 2003 (Vic). For the threshold question of whether a lease is a retail lease at all, see our companion Retail Leases Act scope guide. Getting classification wrong changes the entire dispute pathway — including whether VSBC mediation and VCAT jurisdiction apply.
The Dispute Framework
Retail lease disputes in Victoria are governed by:
- Retail Leases Act 2003 (Vic) — disclosure (section 17), landlord repair obligations (section 52), outgoings recovery (section 46), option process (section 28), assignment consent (section 60), and the dispute resolution machinery (Part 10, sections 81 to 98).
- Property Law Act 1958 (Vic) — section 146 breach and forfeiture notices, and general common-law landlord-tenant principles.
- Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 1998 (Vic) — VCAT jurisdiction, procedure and costs regime under section 109.
- The Victorian Small Business Commission Act 2003 (Vic) — the VSBC's role as the mandatory pre-hearing mediator.
A landlord or tenant that ignores this framework — for example, by issuing a section 146 notice while a VSBC mediation is on foot, or by starting VCAT proceedings without a VSBC certificate — typically loses procedural ground before the merits are heard.
Rent, Estimates and Outgoings
Rent and outgoings disputes are the most frequent retail lease disputes. Common flashpoints include:
- outgoings recovered without proper disclosure or annual reconciliation (section 46);
- land tax passed through where the Act prohibits it (section 50);
- market rent reviews conducted without following section 35 process;
- CPI or fixed reviews that the tenant says do not match the disclosure statement;
- disputes about promotional levies, marketing fund contributions and shopping-centre outgoings.
Where a dispute is properly documented — outgoings statements, reconciliations, disclosure statement and correspondence — the parties can usually agree an adjustment at VSBC mediation. Where it is not, the landlord that cannot produce the reconciliation is the party at risk.
Repairs, Maintenance and Make Good
Section 52 imposes on the landlord an obligation to maintain the structure, plant and equipment used in the retail premises in a condition consistent with its condition at commencement. The tenant is generally responsible for its fit-out. Where the equipment is embedded (for example, an air-conditioning plant serving the premises), the landlord bears the primary responsibility. Disputes about repair are best resolved with a joint inspection, a scope-of-works letter and, if needed, VSBC mediation before either party undertakes the work.
End-of-term make good disputes are best avoided by documenting the condition of the premises — with dated photographs and a condition report — at both commencement and handover. The scope of make good is a question of the lease first and the evidence second; a landlord seeking cash in lieu of make good must be able to explain why physical make good was not appropriate.
Options to Renew and Disclosure
Options to renew are a common source of dispute. The landlord must notify the tenant of the last date to exercise the option at least three months before that date (section 28). A landlord that fails to give the required notice cannot then argue the option has lapsed without giving the tenant a further period to exercise. A defective disclosure statement can also support a tenant termination in the first 90 days (section 17) and can bar recovery of certain outgoings — issues that a landlord's solicitor should review before any dispute escalates.
The VSBC Mediation Pathway
Most retail tenancy disputes must be referred to the Victorian Small Business Commission under section 87 before proceedings can be commenced. The process:
- Party A applies to the VSBC (application, small fee).
- The VSBC assesses whether the dispute is a retail tenancy dispute and, if so, appoints a mediator.
- Mediation is held (often via video), typically within a few weeks.
- If resolved, the parties sign a Heads of Agreement or Deed of Settlement.
- If unresolved, the VSBC issues a certificate under section 87 that enables the applicant to commence at VCAT.
The VSBC does not decide the merits — the mediator facilitates settlement. Prepared parties with a clear position paper, a genuine settlement range and authority to settle resolve most matters at the first mediation.
VCAT and Court Pathways
VCAT's retail tenancies jurisdiction is broad — money claims, injunctions, declarations, orders about outgoings, option process orders and orders about assignment consent. The general rule under section 109 of the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 1998 is that each party bears its own costs; costs orders are available in narrow circumstances (unreasonable conduct, offers of settlement, complexity). Where the dispute is outside VCAT's retail tenancies jurisdiction — a serious common-law claim or an urgent injunction — the Supreme or County Court is the correct forum. See our companion urgent injunctions guide and litigation costs guide.
Evidence and Documentation
- the lease, any variations, and every disclosure statement served;
- every notice served (rent review, option, breach, section 146);
- outgoings estimates and annual reconciliations for the period in dispute;
- condition reports, photographs and video from handover and current inspections;
- correspondence — including emails and text messages between the parties.
Related Guides
See when does the Retail Leases Act apply, resolving a business dispute before court, commercial debt recovery in Victoria and enforcing a judgment debt in Victoria.
Frequently Asked Questions
Do I have to go to the VSBC before I can start proceedings?
In most cases, yes. Section 87 of the Retail Leases Act 2003 (Vic) requires a retail tenancy dispute to be referred to the Victorian Small Business Commission for mediation before either party can commence VCAT proceedings. Limited exceptions apply (for example, urgent injunctions), but the standard course is a VSBC referral first, mediation, and — if unresolved — a certificate from the VSBC that supports proceedings.
Who is responsible for repairs and maintenance under a retail lease?
The Retail Leases Act 2003 (Vic) imposes on the landlord specific structural repair and maintenance obligations under section 52 for the building, plant and equipment used in the retail premises. The tenant is generally responsible for its fit-out and non-structural items. Disputes commonly arise over air-conditioning, roof leaks, plumbing and shopfront damage — the starting point is section 52, then the lease, then the specific facts.
Can the landlord recover any outgoings from the tenant?
Only outgoings that are properly disclosed in the disclosure statement and reasonably attributable to the retail premises can be recovered — section 46 of the Act, together with the disclosure requirements. Land tax is not a recoverable outgoing from a retail tenant (section 50). Estimates must be provided each year and reconciled against actuals; a landlord that fails to reconcile outgoings loses the right to recover the shortfall.
What happens if the disclosure statement is defective?
A defective or missing disclosure statement can give the tenant a right to terminate under section 17 (within the first 90 days) and may bar the landlord from recovering certain outgoings. A defective disclosure statement is one of the most common leverage points in retail lease disputes, particularly where the tenant has taken possession without receiving a compliant statement or where key financial information (outgoings estimates, land use, permitted use, planning restrictions) was materially wrong.
How do options to renew work under the Act?
Section 28 of the Act requires the landlord to notify the tenant of the last date to exercise the option at least three months before that date — and to include specific information about the option and any rent review. A tenant that misses the option date because of a defective landlord notification may have relief. Where market rent applies on renewal, sections 35 and 37 set the process, including access to a specialist retail valuer.
What is a make good obligation and how is it disputed?
'Make good' describes the tenant's obligation at the end of the lease to return the premises to a specified condition. The scope depends on the lease and the condition report at commencement. Common disputes turn on whether the obligation is 'base building', 'as-inspected' or 'strip and return to shell'; whether the landlord has mitigated its loss; and whether a landlord that has re-let the premises can still claim make good in cash. Photographic and video evidence at handover is decisive.
Can the landlord terminate the lease for non-payment of rent?
Only after strict compliance with the notice requirements of the lease, the Retail Leases Act 2003 (Vic) and section 146 of the Property Law Act 1958 (Vic) where the breach falls within it. A defective section 146 notice cannot support re-entry or forfeiture. Where the tenant is in genuine financial difficulty, VSBC mediation frequently produces a payment plan; where the landlord's cash flow is at risk, urgent legal advice is essential to protect the security deposit or bank guarantee.
Can a tenant assign the lease if the landlord refuses consent?
Section 60 of the Act limits the grounds on which a landlord can refuse consent to an assignment — essentially where the proposed assignee has insufficient financial resources or business experience, or refuses to provide reasonable information. A landlord that unreasonably refuses consent, or delays consent, may be liable in damages and may not be able to withhold consent at all. The tenant's obligations on assignment (including a bank guarantee refresh) are governed by section 61.
Do I need a lawyer to attend VSBC mediation?
No — VSBC mediation is designed to be accessible without legal representation, and the mediator will manage the process. In practice, complex disputes benefit from legal preparation: a written position paper, a settlement range, a compliant proposed heads of agreement and a fallback VCAT strategy. Many tenants and landlords attend the mediation themselves with legal support on standby.
How long does a VCAT retail tenancies dispute take?
Short matters can be listed for hearing within a few months of application; complex matters with multiple parties, expert evidence and interlocutory disputes can take 12 to 18 months. VCAT encourages settlement throughout — most matters resolve at compulsory conference or on the doorstep of hearing. Costs are generally not recoverable at VCAT (section 109 of the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 1998), which reshapes the economics of these disputes compared to court proceedings.
Commercial & Business Law
Retail lease dispute? Get advice before the next notice.
Parke Lawyers acts for landlords and tenants in Victorian retail lease disputes — from a first review of a notice to VSBC mediation and, where necessary, VCAT proceedings.
This article is general information only and does not constitute legal advice. Please obtain advice tailored to your circumstances.